HOME FAMILY YESTERDAY SOLVAY STARSTRUCK MIXED BAG
 
 

Helen Stokes was no fan of her brother-in-law
One of the most horrid experiences Mrs. Helen Ellwood Stokes recalled from her marriage to W. E. D. Stokes happened in front of — and because of — her brother-in-law, Thomas Stokes, whom Mrs. Stokes wanted to ban from future visits to her home.

Thomas Stokes, a few years older than W. E. D., apparently was just as notional and unpleasant. He also liked much younger women, at least when choosing his second and last wife. His 1918 wedding turned out to be a sore subject with the Stokes family. Some of them even tried to prevent the wedding.

New York Times, September 12, 1918
Thomas Stokes, 73 years old, a retired financier of this city, brother of W. E. D. Stokes and member of one of the best-known New York families, was married yesterday forenoon to Miss Lillyan Marie Louise Kuenemann, who is forty-three years his junior, in the Justice’s courtroom at Patchogue, L. I. Justice of the Peace C. W. Coleman performed the ceremony after two ministers had refused.

It was a hurried affair, the bridal pair having learned that a representative of the Stokes family in New York was planning to obtain a restraining order from the courts forbidding the marriage. When their engagement was reported last Friday it was said that the wedding would take place within a month.

Meantime Mr. Stokes had arranged with the Rev. Joseph P. Smyth of Bellport, L. I. to perform the ceremony at 3 o’clock Tuesday afternoon, but at a late hour the Rev. Mr. Smyth called up Mr. Stokes, stating the he did not care to officiate.

“I had arranged to perform the ceremony,” said the Rev. Mr. Smyth yesterday, “but Anson Phelps Stokes, a nephew, called on me Tuesday night and asked me not to officiate for family reasons. Later another member of the Stokes family made a similar request, so I decided not to act, and so advised Mr. Stokes.

Last Monday Mr. Stokes called on the Rev. Frederick A. Allen of the Presbyterian Church at Brookhaven, where he has been spending the summer, to officiate, but the minister declined to perform the ceremony.

These stumbling blocks were quickly surmounted yesterday by the hurried civil ceremony, and after the marriage, Mr. Stokes and his bride returned to Brookhaven by the way of Bellport, where they told the Rev. Smyth that they had been married.

Miss Kuenemann, who has been staying in the city, left for Patchogue early in the morning, accompanied by a friend, Miss Delsie Bostwick. She arrived on the 11:02 train and was met by Mr. Stokes. A short time afterward Mr. Stokes sent his negro valet, George Alston, who has been with him for fifteen years, to the Justice of the Peace, asking if the Justice would perform the ceremony.

After the Justice had arranged for the marriage, the valet refused to act as a witness and left the courtroom. Chief of Police William H. Valentine was called in and acted as emergency witness.

After the ceremony Mr. Stokes kissed the bride and Miss Botwick, who stood up, then handed the Justice $5. The couple seemed in radiant spirits despite the obstacles placed in their path. The bride wore a becoming blue traveling suit, and the bridegroom was conspicuous with his English sport cap and red necktie.

Much interest was aroused when the couple’s engagement was reported. Their acquaintance is said to have begun at Paul Smith’s camp in the Adirondacks, where Mr. Stokes was recovering from a paralytic stroke a year ago. Miss Kuenemann has been a frequent guest at Edgewater Inn, at Brookhaven, during the summer, and often dined and motored with Mr. Stokes, who came down to the inn from the Ansonia Hotel early in the season with his valet.

Mr. Stokes is a son of the late James Stokes and inherited a fortune from his father. The late Anson Phelps Stokes was his brother.

His first wife, who was Miss Elizabeth Cossitt and a sister of the late Mrs. A. D. Juilliard, died more than twenty years ago.

Yes, A. D. Juilliard was Augustus D. Juilliard, whose bequest created the famous music school that bears his name.

Two years after his wedding-on-the-run, Thomas Stokes died (October 9, 1920). Even in his last year, Thomas Stokes was able to feed the family habit – he sued his brother W. E. D. Stoke for $18,000, the amount alleged to be due for money loaned in 1914.

On November 20, 1920, the will of Thomas Stokes became known. It disposed to an estate worth more than $1 million.

According to the New York Times, the will gave $100,000 in cash and the personal effects and residuary estate to his wife, Lillyan. To his brother, W. E. D. Stokes, he left a gold watch that had belonged to their father. To W. E. D. Stokes Jr., whom Thomas said he "regarded with the affection of a father," he gave his stock in the Chesapeake & Western Railway and its subsidiaries.

After his death, Thomas Stokes' heirs pursued the 1920 lawsuit against W. E. D. Stokes, who was busy with other legal matters. By 1922, the heirs of Thomas Stokes had upped the ante, and were suing W. E. D. Stokes for alleged unpaid notes in the amount of $100,000, with interest. And on January 23 of that year, the estate of Thomas Stokes was awarded $110,139.

Whether the money was ever paid ... well, that's another matter, though if the matter were still pending in 1926, when W. E. D. Stokes died, it probably was settled soon thereafter.

There likely was no heaven or hell for Thomas, Edward and W. E. D. Stokes. Instead their souls probably were sent to a sort of litigation limbo where they can sue each other for eternity.

 
HOME CONTACT